North Carolina Whistleblower Protection

Posted by Sean Cecil | May 05, 2015 | 2 Comments

North Carolina's Whistleblower Act prohibits employment retaliation against a state employee who files a report alleging certain categories of misconduct or mismanagement by other state employees or agencies. Aggrieved state workers can file a suit in superior court under the Whistleblower statute, or demand a hearing with the Office of Administrative Hearings under the State Human Resources Act (formerly the State Personnel Act). 

The Act states in relevant part: 

(a)  It is the policy of this State that State employees shall be encouraged to report verbally or in writing to their supervisor, department head, or other appropriate authority, evidence of activity by a State agency or State employee constituting:

  • 1)  A violation of State or federal law, rule or regulation
  • (2)  Fraud;
  • (3)  Misappropriation of State resources;
  • (4)  Substantial and specific danger to the public health and safety; or
  • (5)  Gross mismanagement, a gross waste of monies, or gross abuse of authority.

b)  Further, it is the policy of this State that State employees be free of intimidation or harassment when reporting to public bodies about matters of public concern, including offering testimony to or testifying before appropriate legislative panels."


"No head of any State department, agency or institution or other State employee exercising supervisory authority shall discharge, threaten or otherwise discriminate against a State employee regarding the State employee's compensation, terms, conditions, location, or privileges of employment because the State employee, or a person acting on behalf of the employee, reports or is about to report, verbally or in writing, any activity described in G.S. 126-84(above), unless the State employee knows or has reason to believe that the report is inaccurate."

Proof of a Whistleblower Violation

The North Carolina Supreme Court has stated that there are at least three ways for an aggrieved worker to establish a causal connection between a protected activity and an adverse employment action protected by REDA: 

1. An employer's admission that it took adverse action against the plaintiff solely because of the protected activity. This is, for obvious reasons, rare. 

2. Circumstantial evidence: commonly referred to as pretext cases, these involve a shifting burden of persuasion. A worker establishes a temporal relationship between the protected activity and the adverse employment action, the employer then tries to convince the court that the adverse action was for reasons unrelated to the right exercised, and then the worker works to establish that the stated reason is a pretext and that the real reason was the exercise of REDA-protected rights. This is a factually complicated approach, and the worker's disciplinary and performance-review history comes into play. 

3. Mixed-motive cases: When an employer takes adverse action and claims good reason for it, but the employee has direct evidence (smoking gun) of a retaliatory motive, the employee may seek to prove that even if the legitimate basis for discipline existed, unlawful retaliation was nonetheless a "substantial causative factor" for the adverse action. The burden then shifts back to the defendant to prove by a preponderance of evidence that it would have reached the same decision as to the employment action at issue even in the absence of the protected conduct. This requires direct evidence that an illegitimate criterion was a substantial factor in the employment decision. 

The North Carolina Whistleblower Protection Act provides a shield for a limited class of public employees who speak out about specific instances of governmental misconduct. The rights should be approached carefully, and preferably with the assistance of legal counsel. If you would like to speak with an attorney about taking action that you think should be protected under the Whistleblower Act, make an appointment to consult one of the experienced employment law attorneys at Edelstein & Payne by calling 919.828.1456 or by filling out the intake form on our Employment Law page

About the Author

Sean Cecil

Sean is an experienced advocate dedicated to justice for all people. He believes that individual human rights outweigh the freedom to make an easy dollar.


Edna Frank Reply

Posted Aug 26, 2017 at 14:27:39

Would love to hear if an animal shelter volunteer that reports animal neglect has any rights. After reporting she was banned from stepping foot on the property.

Sean Cecil Reply

Posted Aug 28, 2017 at 07:55:33

Thanks for the note, Edna. The North Carolina Whistleblower protections that are the subject of this article only protect State employees. Private employees may enjoy certain protections from retaliation from “whistleblower” related activities, such as a lawsuit alleging wrongful termination in violation of public policy, first recognized as a cause of action in Sides v. Duke university litigated by founding partner Travis Payne.

For a volunteer, among other issues involved with what might otherwise be a wrongful termination claim, there is the issue of damages. It would be very difficult to reach and prove a monetary figure for damages in a case like that, and extremely unlikely to justify the expense and effort of a lawsuit. Anyone volunteering at an animal shelter should report neglect, but should not expect that their volunteer position will be protected.

Leave a Comment

Experienced and Successful

Edelstein & Payne has been dedicated to individual and workers' rights for over 30 years. Our attorneys have consistently been named on best lawyer and superlawyer lists, and have received numerous awards and recognitions for community contributions.

Dedicated to North Carolina Communities

With nearly 80 years of combined experience serving the working people of North Carolina, the lawyers at Edelstein & Payne have proven their dedication to justice for all people.